# Access, Navigation, Icon, and Intern Picker Fix Plan

## Scope

Record the durable workflow for the targeted fixes in this plan. This plan does
not change product behavior, dependencies, schemas, or the five persistent
feature-branch ownership areas.

## Implementation steps

1. Prove RED: the contributor guides lack the realizable repair-branch name.
2. Add one branch rule to contributor guides, design records, plans, and tracked
   coordination authority: `work/fix/<feature>/<what-fix>` from verified
   `main`.
3. State why `work/<feature>/fix/<what-fix>` is invalid while its persistent
   `work/<feature>` ref exists.
4. Regenerate the local SRS after amending the existing operational requirement;
   do not add a requirement ID or a use case.
5. Prove GREEN with the executable six-guide regression that independently
   rejects a positive nested-form recommendation in every guide,
   coordination-authority consistency, requirement/use-case counts, local-link
   resolution, and an immutable base-to-candidate whitespace check. Commit the
   tracked guidance locally; do not push or merge.

## Exit criteria

- The tracked guides, design record, implementation plan, root coordination
  authority, and evidence record agree on the same repair-branch spelling.
- The local authoritative, explained, simple, and generated SRS catalogues keep
  exactly 260 unique requirement IDs and the SRS keeps 14 use cases.
- The forbidden nested form is documented only as forbidden, not as a usable
  branch name.