test: record complete repair workflow validation

docs/tests/unit/fix-branch-workflow-documentation.md

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 - **Round-2 all-guide regression commit:** `97e991317d55db4f7414678a89a45921802a14b8`
 - **Round-2 coordination-authority commit:** `9802d5d17f5c07511e1f9cf59ace4b7e48fcdc0e`
 - **Round-2 plan-contract commit:** `f98e7f39ef38c7882106ffb250155d2a72dcf0dd`
+- **Round-3 complete-workflow commit:** `445e4fedeb0e06724b876c5731437d2c355cacb2`
 
 ## Protected behavior
 
@@ -16,18 +17,22 @@ Targeted repairs use the realizable `work/fix/<feature>/<what-fix>` branch and
 clean worktree from taskmaster-verified `main`. Contributor guidance must reject
 the impossible `work/<feature>/fix/<what-fix>` form while persistent
 `work/<feature>` refs exist. The tracked copies of root coordination authority
-must use the same rule.
+must use the same rule. Every targeted-fix guide must also require the complete
+lifecycle: latest `main`, TDD RED → GREEN, Javadoc during implementation,
+companion evidence, independent review, and an authorized normal, non-force
+merge.
 
 ## Test method
 
 Use the tracked Node validator rather than an artificial Java test. It requires
-the exact approved statement in each of the six guides. Its self-test creates a
+the exact approved branch statement and complete targeted-repair lifecycle in
-fresh positive nested-branch mutation for every guide and asserts the
+each of the six guides. Its self-test independently removes each of the six
-file-specific rejection each time. The copied root coordination files are
+lifecycle elements from every guide and asserts the file-specific rejection. It
-compared byte-for-byte with their main-root sources and checked for their exact
+also retains a fresh positive nested-branch mutation for every guide. The copied
-approved rules. The original RED proves the required branch name was absent
+root coordination files are compared byte-for-byte with their main-root sources
-from the four contributor guides; the first review-fix RED proves the
+and checked for their exact approved rules. The original RED proves the
-executable regression was absent.
+required branch name was absent from the four contributor guides; the first
+review-fix RED proves the executable regression was absent.
 
 ## Hand-derived expected result
 
@@ -35,8 +40,9 @@ The required fix-branch spelling appears exactly once in each of the six tracked
 documentation artifacts, and the only nested-form reference is inside that
 artifact's exact approved statement. Each independent simulated positive
 nested-branch recommendation must fail. The three tracked coordination files
-must exactly match the authorized main-root versions. The existing SRS generator
+must exactly match the authorized main-root versions. Loss of any lifecycle
-must still report 260 requirements and 14 use cases.
+element from any guide must fail. The existing SRS generator must still report
+260 requirements and 14 use cases.
 
 ## RED
 
@@ -91,6 +97,29 @@ The prior self-test reported only a singular rejection and mutated only
 `AGENTS.md`; it did not prove an independent rejection for each of the six
 guides.
 
+### Round-3 RED
+
+**Command**
+
+```text
+node --check scripts/verify-fix-branch-workflow.cjs
+node scripts/verify-fix-branch-workflow.cjs --self-test
+```
+
+**Observed result**
+
+```text
+exit 1
+Error: AGENTS.md must contain the complete required targeted-repair workflow exactly once
+README.md must contain the complete required targeted-repair workflow exactly once
+DEVELOPMENT.md must contain the complete required targeted-repair workflow exactly once
+TESTING.md must contain the complete required targeted-repair workflow exactly once
+docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker-design.md must contain the complete required targeted-repair workflow exactly once
+docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker.md must contain the complete required targeted-repair workflow exactly once
+```
+
+The six guides had branch naming but not the complete lifecycle contract.
+
 ## Initial GREEN
 
 **Command**
@@ -122,6 +151,23 @@ Fix-branch workflow documentation: 6 approved statements validated
 Positive nested branch recommendations: 6/6 rejected
 ```
 
+### Round-3 GREEN
+
+**Command**
+
+```text
+node --check scripts/verify-fix-branch-workflow.cjs
+node scripts/verify-fix-branch-workflow.cjs --self-test
+```
+
+**Observed result**
+
+```text
+Fix-branch workflow documentation: 6 approved statements validated
+Targeted-repair workflow element removals: 36/36 rejected
+Positive nested branch recommendations: 6/6 rejected
+```
+
 ## Affected suite
 
 **Command and result**
@@ -131,7 +177,7 @@ node labtimesheet-docs-hub/ui-mockups/build-srs.cjs
 node -e 'const fs=require("node:fs"); const checks=[["authoritative","labtimesheet-docs-hub/requirements-specification.md",/^\| ([A-Z]{2,4}-\d{3}) \|/gm],["explained","labtimesheet-docs-hub/explained/requirements-specification.md",/^\| ([A-Z]{2,4}-\d{3}) \|/gm],["simple","labtimesheet-docs-hub/explained/requirements-specification-simple.md",/^- \*\*([A-Z]{2,4}-\d{3}):\*\*/gm],["generated SRS","labtimesheet-docs-hub/software-requirements-specification.md",/^\| ([A-Z]{2,4}-\d{3}) \|/gm]]; for (const [name,file,pattern] of checks) { const ids=[...fs.readFileSync(file,"utf8").matchAll(pattern)].map(match=>match[1]); if (ids.length !== 260 || new Set(ids).size !== 260) throw new Error(`${name}: ${ids.length} rows, ${new Set(ids).size} unique`); console.log(`${name}: ${ids.length} rows, ${new Set(ids).size} unique IDs`); } const srs=fs.readFileSync("labtimesheet-docs-hub/software-requirements-specification.md","utf8"); const useCases=(srs.match(/^### 5\.\d+ UC-\d{2} —/gm)||[]).length; if (useCases !== 14) throw new Error(`SRS use cases: ${useCases}`); console.log(`generated SRS: ${useCases} use cases`);'
 node -e 'const fs=require("node:fs"); const path=require("node:path"); let checked=0; const broken=[]; for (const file of process.argv.slice(1)) { const text=fs.readFileSync(file,"utf8"); for (const match of text.matchAll(/!?\[[^\]]*\]\(([^)]+)\)/g)) { const target=match[1].trim().replace(/^<|>$/g,"").split("#")[0].split("?")[0]; if (!target || /^[a-z][a-z0-9+.-]*:/i.test(target) || target.startsWith("//")) continue; checked += 1; if (!fs.existsSync(path.resolve(path.dirname(file), decodeURIComponent(target)))) broken.push(`${file}: ${target}`); } } if (broken.length) throw new Error(`Broken local Markdown links:\n${broken.join("\n")}`); console.log(`Local Markdown links: ${checked} resolved`);' AGENTS.md README.md DEVELOPMENT.md TESTING.md docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker-design.md docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker.md docs/tests/unit/fix-branch-workflow-documentation.md
 cmp -s .agents/PROJECT_PLAN.md /Users/sechmachine/Documents/WebProjects/labtimesheet/.agents/PROJECT_PLAN.md && cmp -s .agents/skills/orchestrate-labtimesheet-iteration/SKILL.md /Users/sechmachine/Documents/WebProjects/labtimesheet/.agents/skills/orchestrate-labtimesheet-iteration/SKILL.md && cmp -s PRODUCT.md /Users/sechmachine/Documents/WebProjects/labtimesheet/PRODUCT.md && node -e 'const fs=require("node:fs"); const files=[".agents/PROJECT_PLAN.md",".agents/skills/orchestrate-labtimesheet-iteration/SKILL.md","PRODUCT.md"]; const forms=["work/fix/<feature>/<what-fix>","work/<feature>/fix/<what-fix>"]; for (const file of files) { const text=fs.readFileSync(file,"utf8"); for (const form of forms) { if (text.split(form).length !== 2) throw new Error(file+": expected one "+form); } } console.log("Root coordination authority: "+files.length+" approved branch rules match exactly");'
-git diff --check 8be1b754e188367b260981718a5d33fc2d4d8a3b f98e7f39ef38c7882106ffb250155d2a72dcf0dd
+git diff --check 8be1b754e188367b260981718a5d33fc2d4d8a3b 445e4fedeb0e06724b876c5731437d2c355cacb2
 ```
 
 The SRS regeneration and count assertion ran from the main root because the
@@ -149,10 +195,11 @@ simple: 260 rows, 260 unique IDs
 generated SRS: 260 rows, 260 unique IDs
 generated SRS: 14 use cases
 Fix-branch workflow documentation: 6 approved statements validated
+Targeted-repair workflow element removals: 36/36 rejected
 Positive nested branch recommendations: 6/6 rejected
 Root coordination authority: 3 approved branch rules match exactly
 Local Markdown links: 7 resolved
-git diff --check 8be1b754e188367b260981718a5d33fc2d4d8a3b f98e7f39ef38c7882106ffb250155d2a72dcf0dd: exit 0
+git diff --check 8be1b754e188367b260981718a5d33fc2d4d8a3b 445e4fedeb0e06724b876c5731437d2c355cacb2: exit 0
 ```
 
 ## External-test boundaries