test: strengthen fix branch workflow evidence

docs/tests/unit/fix-branch-workflow-documentation.md

@@ -3,8 +3,9 @@
 - **Test type:** Unit (documentation contract)
 - **Requirement IDs:** `OPS-019`, `TST-009`, `TST-010`
 - **Scenario IDs:** `AC-TST-001`
-- **Test class/method:** Shell documentation contract: `fixBranchWorkflowRule`
+- **Test class/method:** `scripts/verify-fix-branch-workflow.cjs --self-test`
 - **Implementation commit:** `f013ad7707b36959ddca891fe0d52f81bba3ee80`
+- **Review-fix commit:** `d617769499362e92d058684501af3c1ae6b145b0`
 
 ## Protected behavior
 
@@ -15,17 +16,18 @@ the impossible `work/<feature>/fix/<what-fix>` form while persistent
 
 ## Test method
 
-Use fixed-string repository searches rather than an artificial Java test. The
+Use the tracked Node validator rather than an artificial Java test. It requires
-RED proves the required branch name was absent from the four contributor guides.
+the exact approved statement in each of the six guides, then self-tests that an
-The GREEN checks every tracked guide and the design/plan records, then the
+extra positive nested-branch recommendation is rejected. The original RED
-local requirements/SRS generator checks the unchanged requirement and use-case
+proves the required branch name was absent from the four contributor guides;
-counts.
+the review-fix RED proves the executable regression was absent.
 
 ## Hand-derived expected result
 
-The required fix-branch spelling appears in all six tracked documentation
+The required fix-branch spelling appears exactly once in each of the six tracked
-artifacts. The four contributor guides and design record identify the nested
+documentation artifacts, and the only nested-form reference is inside that
-form only as forbidden. The existing SRS generator must still report 260
+artifact's exact approved statement. A simulated positive nested-branch
+recommendation must fail. The existing SRS generator must still report 260
 requirements and 14 use cases.
 
 ## RED
@@ -45,27 +47,37 @@ exit 1; no matching lines
 The failure was expected: the required realizable repair-branch rule was absent
 before this documentation change.
 
-## GREEN
+### Review-fix RED
 
 **Command**
 
 ```text
-rg -n -F 'work/fix/<feature>/<what-fix>' AGENTS.md README.md DEVELOPMENT.md TESTING.md docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker-design.md docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker.md && rg -n -F 'work/<feature>/fix/<what-fix>' AGENTS.md README.md DEVELOPMENT.md TESTING.md docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker-design.md docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker.md
+node scripts/verify-fix-branch-workflow.cjs --self-test
 ```
 
 **Observed result**
 
 ```text
-exit 0
+exit 1
-AGENTS.md:123
+Error: Cannot find module '.../scripts/verify-fix-branch-workflow.cjs'
-README.md:131
+```
-DEVELOPMENT.md:68
-TESTING.md:124
-docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker-design.md:17
-docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker.md:13
 
-The nested form appears only in instructions that call it invalid, forbidden,
+The executable regression required to reject a positive nested-branch
-or a form not to use.
+recommendation did not exist.
+
+## GREEN
+
+**Command**
+
+```text
+node scripts/verify-fix-branch-workflow.cjs --self-test
+```
+
+**Observed result**
+
+```text
+Fix-branch workflow documentation: 6 approved statements validated
+Positive nested branch recommendation: rejected
 ```
 
 ## Affected suite
@@ -76,13 +88,14 @@ or a form not to use.
 node labtimesheet-docs-hub/ui-mockups/build-srs.cjs
 node -e 'const fs=require("node:fs"); const checks=[["authoritative","labtimesheet-docs-hub/requirements-specification.md",/^\| ([A-Z]{2,4}-\d{3}) \|/gm],["explained","labtimesheet-docs-hub/explained/requirements-specification.md",/^\| ([A-Z]{2,4}-\d{3}) \|/gm],["simple","labtimesheet-docs-hub/explained/requirements-specification-simple.md",/^- \*\*([A-Z]{2,4}-\d{3}):\*\*/gm],["generated SRS","labtimesheet-docs-hub/software-requirements-specification.md",/^\| ([A-Z]{2,4}-\d{3}) \|/gm]]; for (const [name,file,pattern] of checks) { const ids=[...fs.readFileSync(file,"utf8").matchAll(pattern)].map(match=>match[1]); if (ids.length !== 260 || new Set(ids).size !== 260) throw new Error(`${name}: ${ids.length} rows, ${new Set(ids).size} unique`); console.log(`${name}: ${ids.length} rows, ${new Set(ids).size} unique IDs`); } const srs=fs.readFileSync("labtimesheet-docs-hub/software-requirements-specification.md","utf8"); const useCases=(srs.match(/^### 5\.\d+ UC-\d{2} —/gm)||[]).length; if (useCases !== 14) throw new Error(`SRS use cases: ${useCases}`); console.log(`generated SRS: ${useCases} use cases`);'
 node -e 'const fs=require("node:fs"); const path=require("node:path"); let checked=0; const broken=[]; for (const file of process.argv.slice(1)) { const text=fs.readFileSync(file,"utf8"); for (const match of text.matchAll(/!?\[[^\]]*\]\(([^)]+)\)/g)) { const target=match[1].trim().replace(/^<|>$/g,"").split("#")[0].split("?")[0]; if (!target || /^[a-z][a-z0-9+.-]*:/i.test(target) || target.startsWith("//")) continue; checked += 1; if (!fs.existsSync(path.resolve(path.dirname(file), decodeURIComponent(target)))) broken.push(`${file}: ${target}`); } } if (broken.length) throw new Error(`Broken local Markdown links:\n${broken.join("\n")}`); console.log(`Local Markdown links: ${checked} resolved`);' AGENTS.md README.md DEVELOPMENT.md TESTING.md docs/superpowers/specs/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker-design.md docs/superpowers/plans/2026-08-15-access-navigation-icon-intern-picker.md docs/tests/unit/fix-branch-workflow-documentation.md
-git diff --check
+git diff --check 8be1b754e188367b260981718a5d33fc2d4d8a3b d617769499362e92d058684501af3c1ae6b145b0
 ```
 
 The SRS regeneration and count assertion ran from the main root because the
 ignored requirements hub is local authority there. The link assertion and
-`git diff --check` ran from this fix worktree; the SRS generator also rejects a
+the exact base-to-candidate `git diff --check` ran from this fix worktree; the
-broken local SRS target before it writes the generated file.
+SRS generator also rejects a broken local SRS target before it writes the
+generated file.
 
 ```text
 Wrote labtimesheet-docs-hub/software-requirements-specification.md
@@ -92,8 +105,10 @@ explained: 260 rows, 260 unique IDs
 simple: 260 rows, 260 unique IDs
 generated SRS: 260 rows, 260 unique IDs
 generated SRS: 14 use cases
+Fix-branch workflow documentation: 6 approved statements validated
+Positive nested branch recommendation: rejected
 Local Markdown links: 7 resolved
-git diff --check: exit 0
+git diff --check 8be1b754e188367b260981718a5d33fc2d4d8a3b d617769499362e92d058684501af3c1ae6b145b0: exit 0
 ```
 
 ## External-test boundaries