feat(protocol): negotiate registered gateway profiles
This commit is contained in:
@@ -13,3 +13,21 @@ Generated Go, Rust, and Swift bindings MUST reject missing, unknown, out-of-rang
|
||||
#### Scenario: Invalid policy is rejected consistently
|
||||
- **WHEN** provider work contains an unknown codec or a value outside the canonical bounds
|
||||
- **THEN** every generated binding rejects the work before it can reach provider setup
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Decode capabilities use registered ordered profiles
|
||||
`CapabilityProfile.client_decode` SHALL be a non-empty ordered unique set containing only registered `h264-opus` and `hevc-opus` profile identifiers. It MUST NOT encode multiple capabilities in an opaque private token.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Independent peer advertises one registered profile
|
||||
- **WHEN** an independent peer advertises one registered decode profile
|
||||
- **THEN** canonical validation accepts that profile without requiring a combined private token
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirement: Consumers share one ordered registered-profile intersection
|
||||
Generated Protocol behavior SHALL select common registered profiles in the first peer's preference order. Provider consumers SHALL separately reject the resulting intersection when it cannot honor the immutable stream policy.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: Policy-compatible profile overlaps
|
||||
- **WHEN** the gateway advertises HEVC then H.264 and the client advertises only H.264
|
||||
- **THEN** the shared intersection selects `h264-opus`
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scenario: No policy-compatible profile overlaps
|
||||
- **WHEN** peers have no registered common profile
|
||||
- **THEN** the shared intersection rejects admission without inventing a private combined token
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user